@tdhurst Hates Ignite: The Rebuttal
TweetTyler Hurst posted Why I hate Ignite yesterday. Most of his 10 points were incorrect, false or just plain unsupported opinion. I offer a point-by-point rebuttal to Tyler:
- Yes, it generally is newbies. Hearing the same people over and over again would get boring. We all love Evo Terra, Pam Slim, etc., but we don’t want to see them give an Ignite presentation about their passion every time. We hear about their passions through their well-publicized work. Also, the presenters aren’t out there to make their mark. They present because they want to share their passion for a particular topic with the rest of the community. Jonathan McNamara wasn’t presenting because he wanted to make his mark by talking about Gundam robots; he just wanted to share his passion.
- It’s run by the same people because they’ve gotten good at it and have learned from experience. Also, so what about the “look and feel”? It’s an hour and half event every three months. Unless the look and feel really sucks ass, no one’s going to be worked up about it.
- Since when did you care what “mainstream media” says?
- Audience interaction happens before the event, during intermission, after the event, at the after party and on Twitter throughout the event. You would know this if you’d been to an Ignite Phoenix.
- Short is the point. The format maintains momentum and energy.
- The motivation to not screw up is the deep rooted human desire to not look like a complete dumbass in front of a theater full of people. Most people aren’t as comfortable in front of an audience as you are. To call presenting at Ignite easy disrespects the time, effort and courage that presenters put into their work.
- Yes it is. If you manage to find one, please let Jeff or another Ignite team member know.
- That’s your completely unsupported opinion. The 400+ people who have attended the past 2 Ignites don’t share it.
- The presentations aren’t meant to be epics which cause tremendous changes in the community for years to come. They’re meant to be five minutes in which the presenter displays passion for their topic. The long term effects come as a result of the community getting together and seeing what people are passionate about. The connections which are formed and conversations which are started as a result of Ignite are what really bring about long term change.
- WTF? Can you elaborate on and support that opinion a little more, because I’m not exactly sure what you mean.
Tyler, since you have yet to attend an Ignite, it seems very difficult for you to render a valid judgment of the event and the concept.
More From Matthew Petro
- What is Ignite Phoenix really?
- Ruminations* on Ignite Phoenix 6
- The medium changes, the response does not
Matthew Petro Recommends
- The Wrath of Google! (Chad Nicely)
- So What’s The Scoop With The Warrior Forum. (Chad Nicely)
- Blog Marketing – Brings in The Checks All The Time (Chad Nicely)
Pingback: My take on Ignite Phoenix « Katie Charland